Yes, we want the geronimo version for the specs. regards,
Karl On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 1:41 PM Konrad Windszus <[email protected]> wrote: > > Also according to https://johnzon.apache.org/#Get_started > <https://johnzon.apache.org/#Get_started> you should reference the > geronimo-json_1.1_spec > for the API dependency (don't know though for which reason). > But I would follow the advice from Apache Johnzon... > > Konrad > > > On 3. Jul 2019, at 13:38, [email protected] wrote: > > > > Hi Simo, > > > > On the change to javax.json:javax.json-api:1.1.4 - that is the license of > > that jar? Just making sure that it's licensed in a compatible way for the > > ASF. > > > > Best regards, > > > > David > > > > On Tue, 2 Jul 2019 at 23:38, Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> I just did a simple experiment in the o.a.s.feature.io bundle by > >> replacing the following dependencies: > >> > >> org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-json_1.0_spec:1.0-alpha-1 -> > >> javax.json:javax.json-api:1.1.4 > >> org.apache.johnzon:johnzon-core:1.0.0 -> > >> org.apache.johnzon:johnzon-core:1.1.12 > >> > >> Despite the fact that new APIs are the official version, they also are > >> compatible with the existing Sling bundle and contain few new methods > >> that would allow me implementing the Feature streaming APIs in an > >> easier way. > >> > >> WDYT? Is there any blocker on upgrading the dependencies? > >> TIA, > >> ~Simo > >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > >> > -- Karl Pauls [email protected]
