[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16996979#comment-16996979
 ] 

Scott Yuan commented on SLING-8246:
-----------------------------------

Hi Robert, having a exclusion list for problematic OSGi bundles would work 
perfectly for my need.  If there hasn't been a work done for it yet, I can 
provide a pull request to give it a try.
-Scott Yuan

> Server side test hang with repeat "Waiting for the following bundles to 
> start:..." in log
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-8246
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-8246
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Apache Sling Testing Clients, JUnit Core
>    Affects Versions: JUnit Core 1.0.20, JUnit Core 1.0.22, JUnit Core 1.0.23, 
> JUnit Core 1.0.24, JUnit Core 1.0.26
>         Environment: OS: Windows, Linux
> Java:  Java 1.8
>            Reporter: Scott Yuan
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: patch.diff
>
>   Original Estimate: 0.5h
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 20m
>
> +SLING-6334 - Server-Side Tests: Wait until all bundles are started be…+ had 
> been a great feature for ensuring accurate test results. Thanks for having 
> this feature available.
> I recently found that if there is a bundle failed to start; SLING-6334 
> doesn't timeout after DEFAULT_SYSTEM_STARTUP_INACTIVITY_TIMEOUT_SECONDS but 
> waits infinitely with repeating log message
> {noformat}
> 26.01.2019 13:58:14.562 *INFO* [qtp980475582-2859] 
> org.apache.sling.junit.impl.TestsManagerImpl Waiting for the following 
> bundles to start: [adobe-aemfd-signatures [777], 
> com.ags.forms.commom.ags_forms_common [854]]
> {noformat}
> In my case, we needed the server side tests continue to work while the bundle 
> starting problem being addressed in parallel. With some studies to the source 
> code, the issue can be fixed by a single liner change in the attached .diff 
> file.
> Hopefully, the problem can be addressed in the upcoming 1.0.27 release.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to