Hi Robert, That sounds like a very nice addition. I think it could be an additional Feature Model analyser, that runs as part of the set of analysers. I don't think it was considered before, could you please file an issue for it?
Best regards, David On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 at 13:28, Robert Munteanu <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Being a sloppy typist, I often get the configuration values wrong in > feature model files. I am thinking that validating the configuration > values defined in a feature model file against the metatype definition > of the matching components would help a lot. > > Is there something like this planned? If not, would it make sense to > add it to the roadmap? > > Thanks, > Robert > >
