Hi,

I keep thinking about how the feature files would look like in a
different format. The main driver is the way repoinit statements look
at the moment. Comments are also a bit awkward, even though possible in
JSON.

I was looking at Jsonnet [1], which is a superset of JSON with lots of
bells and whistles, including comments and multiline strings.

But irrespective of format - Jsonnet, YAML, or something else - what
would it take to add another input format to the feature model? Is it
something can be easily plugged in or would it require a significant
rewrite?

Thanks,
Robert


[1]: https://jsonnet.org/

Reply via email to