On 24. Sep 2020, at 11:58, Robert Munteanu <[email protected]> wrote: > > We created Jira versions in the form of 'Artifact Name' 'Version' for > quite some time, only one of them stands out by being different. Just a > note, not something bad by itself.
I would very much appreciate consistency in the naming. This is IMHO more important than the fact whether we use artifactId or artifactName. It is important for committers to know how to label things correctly. I myself am used to using artifact names. I probably wouldn't find artifact ids. As the reporters very rarely fill that field anyways, I think we use what works best for committers. And (speaking only for myself) with that in mind I would keep "OSGi Feature Maven Plugin" and not rename back to artifact id. Konrad
