I think there is something wrong with the build of the contrib modules, but
I haven't paid close enough attention to this area to know for sure. I
didn't see any Jira issues that explain this, but didn't have time for a
comprehensive search.

I downloaded
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Artifacts-main/416/ and
noticed a couple of issues:

* None of the READMEs that are in the source appear in their module
directories
* The new contrib/scripting module added in SOLR-14067 is not appearing at
all, although there is a solr-scripting-*.jar in the dist/ directory
* The lucene-libs directories under contrib/analysis-extras and
contrib/prometheus-exporter are of course missing, but since the READMEs
are missing it's not clear if they're needed (the solr-exporter seemed to
start fine without it)

Am I discovering something that everyone else already knows about? If the
READMEs are supposed to be gone now, where are the Ref Guide updates to
replace that configuration knowledge?

On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 5:29 AM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> wrote:

> Can someone qualified comment on
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12281regarding what to do wrt
> index back-compat policy in Solr 9.0? Do we want any code changes?
>
> Jan
>
> 21. okt. 2021 kl. 15:19 skrev Jan Høydahl <[email protected]>:
>
> Hi,
>
> The Lucene 9.0 release is starting to materialize with a clearn timeline
> for v8.11 as the last 8.x and then 9.0 immediately after.
>
> We should start preparing for Solr 9.0 by updating the list of real
> blockers and decide which of those require commits in 8.x (deprecations,
> preparation for upgrade compat).
>
> Here's the current blocker list for Solr:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20SOLR%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%22main%20(9.0)%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
>
> <Skjermbilde 2021-10-21 kl. 15.16.06.png>
>
> Please review these. I think several can be closed as unrealistic, and
> probably new ones can be added. I have started looking at HTTP1 deprecation
> in SOLR-15223.
>
>
> Jan
>
>
>

Reply via email to