Hmm, My understanding was that V2 Config API is part of the V2 APIs and relevant discussion, so when the questions about gaps came up, I felt it was relevant. Perhaps it is less relevant than I thought. I will let others judge and apologize if I introduced too much noise.
Regards, Alex. On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 12:04, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <[email protected]> wrote: > > Alex, these seem to be issues with config API (and should be solved), while > this discussion is about v2 version of all APIs. What is the relevance here? > > On Wed, 27 Oct, 2021, 9:24 pm Alexandre Rafalovitch, <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> I feel that the summary of my umbrella case (SOLR-14795) qualifies for this: >> >> " >> General issues with output being materialized schema: >> * parameters have already been resolved and are not indicated >> * empty keys may not be output (e.g. dataDir) >> * default parameters will be output that are not in solrconfig.xml >> " >> >> This had failed to start the discussion at the time, but I feel that >> it should have, as Solr configuration without being able to specify >> and propagate the defaults implies a very different workflow. >> >> On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 11:34, Ishan Chattopadhyaya >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > some aspects of the v2 API are clearly downgrades from the v1 API. >> > >> > Please open a JIRA, and we can discuss there. If there's already any >> > discussion, please point to them. >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
