Works for me…. I don’t know that I have a strong reason to say that sorting
is the way to go, and therefore can’t come up with a reason for a checkbox
feature to do it either ;-).
> On Nov 18, 2021, at 3:28 PM, Shawn Heisey <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> It's been bugging me for a while that the JVM Args list in the Solr Admin UI
> is sorted, not shown in the actual order the arguments appear on the command
> that started Solr.
>
> With the list of arguments sorted by the UI, you can't tell what the actual
> order is. If you look at a process listing, the order can be seen, but the
> admin UI is often the first thing people look at. I think the admin UI
> should reflect the true argument order, not sort the list.
>
> If there were a really large number of arguments, scanning an unsorted list
> to find something specific might become difficult, but I don't think a
> typical install has so many arguments that this is a practical problem.
> Maybe there could be an checkbox option near the list to sort it for
> situations where somebody actually wants to do that? I don't know enough
> about UI design to be able to make that happen.
>
> In server/solr-webapp/webapp/js/angular/controllers/index.js is this line:
>
> $scope.commandLineArgs = data.jvm.jmx.commandLineArgs.sort();
>
> I removed".sort()" from that line on an install of 8.11.0. On page reload,
> the list was no longer sorted.
>
> I figured I should ask people what they think before committing that change.
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
_______________________
Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 |
http://www.opensourceconnections.com <http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> |
My Free/Busy <http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed
<https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw>
This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be
Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of whether
attachments are marked as such.
