Proposed time works for me ;-)
> On Jan 10, 2022, at 9:36 PM, David Smiley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I would like to propose that we have Solr committer online meetings, as we
> did sporadically previously, but henceforth quarterly & scheduled in advance.
> I enjoyed seeing all your faces, complementing each other on our fine work,
> and getting down to business of discussing the evolution of Solr. Mike D's
> proposal to share complements was awesome, from last time! I think seeing
> each other is really helpful for the group of us on multiple levels. If we
> schedule them in advance with predetermined organizers and maybe even the
> time, they will happen and not be forgotten. It should also be less work to
> plan if it's automatic. Credit on this idea is shared with Eric Pugh.
>
> I volunteer to do the next 4 of them, and to use the Google Meet platform. I
> can record them for the benefit of anyone who can't make it.
>
> Let's start next week on Thursday, January 20th; okay? I routinely meet with
> colleagues between Europe and US West coast, and I think noon probably is the
> balance between the two. In India, this is at 10:30pm. If you would prefer
> I do the doodle.com <http://doodle.com/> thing to find the best coordinated
> time; I can do that.
>
> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Solr+Committer+Meeting&iso=20220120T11&p1=43&ah=1
>
> <https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Solr+Committer+Meeting&iso=20220120T11&p1=43&ah=1>
>
>
> ~ David Smiley
> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley>
_______________________
Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 |
http://www.opensourceconnections.com <http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> |
My Free/Busy <http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed
<https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw>
This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be
Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of whether
attachments are marked as such.
