Gus, re: the SKG failure: I was able to reproduce it, but haven't dug in enough to say exactly what's going on. (off-the-cuff response: this test is quite robust, and has uncovered edge-case issues before that are more about "distributed faceting" generally than about "SKG" per se). I'd be surprised if this turns out to be a blocker for 9.0, but on the other hand it doesn't appear to reproduce equally on branch_8x, so I'm not necessarily assuming anything. More soon ...
On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 10:03 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Noble and I just came across a bug in master concerning restarting of > Solr, where it was observed that registering live_nodes upon restart was > failing with NodeExistsException. We haven't looked further and don't know > if it affects 9.0. > > In case it is a problem, and 9.0 has already released, we can try to find > a workaround or do a bug fix release. > > Just letting you know what we know and don't know. > > On Mon, 2 May, 2022, 4:25 pm Jan Høydahl, <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> If I close the vote now, it will technically pass with four +1s, one -1 >> and one -0. A bit too fragile result IMO. >> >> I would too like to understand the severity of the configsets bug, and >> whether it is serious enough to stop the release. >> As I understand the issue, it ONLY affects those creating a new configset >> based on another one in ZK. >> I.e. there are many workarounds for this bug >> - Use an authenticated user when creating configset (and not an >> "untrusted" one) >> - Upload a new configset rather than basing it on an existing? >> - Upload configset directly to Zookeeper >> >> Please verify or shoot down my assumption. If my assumption is correct, >> I'll keep my +1 vote, and wait for a few more +1s before closing the vote. >> If the issue is indeed more serious and there are more -1's, I'll happily >> respin after the fix. >> >> Jan >> >> >> 29. apr. 2022 kl. 21:03 skrev Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com>: >> >> -0 for now, pending discussion of severity... I have hit a reproducing >> failure: >> >> ./gradlew :solr:core:test --tests >> "org.apache.solr.search.facet.TestCloudJSONFacetSKGEquiv.testRandom" >> -Ptests.jvms=5 -Ptests.jvmargs=-XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1 >> -Ptests.seed=C730F33909C71234 -Ptests.badapples=false >> -Ptests.file.encoding=UTF-8 >> >> On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 1:28 PM Kevin Risden <kris...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Smoketester passed on the second try for me: SUCCESS! [1:29:24.214674] >>> >>> The first failure was "gradlew :solr:core:test --tests >>> "org.apache.solr.cloud.HttpPartitionOnCommitTest.test" -Ptests.jvms=4 >>> -Ptests.jvmargs=-XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1 -Ptests.seed=66730F3AEF630DB6 >>> -Ptests.badapples=false -Ptests.file.encoding=US-ASCII". I haven't >>> reproduced it yet. >>> >>> However it looks like the configsets API is broken with one of the >>> simpler examples. Eric Pugh found this the other day and asked me to >>> check on 9.0 RC4: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16164 >>> >>> I'm still poking around the release today. >>> >>> Based on the configset api error - I'm -1 for releasing. >>> >>> Kevin Risden >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 11:26 AM Mike Drob <md...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> >>>> Smoketester succeeded with Java 11 and Java 17 -- SUCCESS! >>>> [2:04:03.678208] >>>> >>>> Unlike for some others, this succeeded on my first try. I guess I'm >>>> just lucky :) >>>> >>>> >>>> Tested building an application that uses EmbeddedSolrServer and depends >>>> on our maven artifacts - validated SOLR-16157, SOLR-16117 >>>> >>>> Tested a mixed state cluster with 8.11.1 and 9.0.0 nodes (no security). >>>> Queries worked as expected. >>>> Tested a rolling upgrade from 8.11.1 to 9.0.0 with basic authentication >>>> enabled. Queries failed (as expected) at first, but then succeeded when >>>> setting solr.pki.sendVersion=v1 and solr.pki.acceptVersions=v1,v2on >>>> the Solr 9 node, as described in our ref guide and upgrade notes. >>>> >>>> Manually checked for license headers in source release, missing headers >>>> on the following: >>>> * SYSTEM_REQUIREMENTS.md >>>> * solr/core/src/resources/SystemCollection*.xml >>>> * lots and lots of stuff under solr-ref-guide, unclear which pieces of >>>> this are our code and which are copied from external sources. >>>> * modules/*/README.md >>>> >>>> Will file a follow up JIRA for the license issues. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 8:15 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Please vote for release candidate 4 for Solr 9.0.0 >>>>> >>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >>>>> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.0.0-RC4-rev-d6e36d590896755ca962c6d2ddedf78ca4f463cc >>>>> >>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >>>>> >>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >>>>> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.0.0-RC4-rev-d6e36d590896755ca962c6d2ddedf78ca4f463cc >>>>> >>>>> You are encouraged to do an extra thorough test and manual inspection >>>>> beyond >>>>> running the smoketester, since this is a major release. >>>>> >>>>> You can build a release-candidate of the official docker image using >>>>> the following command: >>>>> >>>>> DIST_BASE=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr && \ >>>>> >>>>> RC_FOLDER=solr-9.0.0-RC4-rev-d6e36d590896755ca962c6d2ddedf78ca4f463cc && \ >>>>> docker build $DIST_BASE/$RC_FOLDER/solr/docker/Dockerfile.official \ >>>>> --build-arg >>>>> SOLR_DOWNLOAD_URL=$DIST_BASE/$RC_FOLDER/solr/solr-9.0.0.tgz \ >>>>> -t solr-rc:9.0.0-4 >>>>> >>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2022-04-30 >>>>> 13:00 UTC. >>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1 approve >>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>>>> >>>>> Here is my +1 >>>>> >>>>> SUCCESS! [0:56:56.134141] >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> >> >> -- >> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >> >> >>
