+1 non binding. I absolutely love it.
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 2:50 AM Alessandro Benedetti <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jan, > I took a look, there's no problem with the triple search as before (but > this was expected as Houston gave the explanation weeks ago). > The new sections look good as well (minor formatting with the dense vector > similarity distances, but I don't really know how to fix it/ if it is worth > fixing it). > > To me is a +1 > > Cheers > -------------------------- > *Alessandro Benedetti* > CEO @ Sease Ltd. > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer* > *Apache Solr PMC Member* > > e-mail: [email protected] > > > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied > Consulting | Training | Open Source > > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/> > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github > <https://github.com/seaseltd> > > > On Sun, 8 May 2022 at 23:49, Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The 9.0 (beta)) reference guide is now viewable on the main website >> (although not yet linked to from anywhere): >> >> https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/9_0/ >> >> Please take a moment to browse through and report (or better, submit a PR >> for) any issues. >> >> Things to pay attention to: >> - New structure, links etc >> - Test tnat tutorials, examples, commands work >> - All new 9.0 features documented >> - Removed features removed from guide >> >> PS: The "Upgrade Notes" is still work in progress. >> >> Jan >> > -- Marcus Eagan
