> I knew we lost the tabs but thought it didn’t look *terrible* That was my impression exactly. I like the tabs of course, but was surprised with how decent things still look without them. It's not bad at all!
Thanks for the info Cassandra! I'll file a ticket so this is written down somewhere and take a crack at it, see if it isn't in my limited JS/CSS wheelhouse haha. Best, Jason On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 4:21 PM Cassandra Targett <[email protected]> wrote: > We got those tabs from Bootstrap which had built-in support for them > (they’re called “navs”: https://getbootstrap.com/docs/4.6/components/navs/ > ). > > Due to the way Antora deals with the UI for a docs site, I did not try to > re-implement the bootstrap framework and all that - it was simpler to try > to take Antora’s default UI files and edit those to make it look vaguely > similar to what we had. But a casualty was that tab functionality. I knew > we lost the tabs but thought it didn’t look *terrible* with how it came out > without it - I might have vaguely meant to go back to it, but didn’t. > > I expect it’d be a bit complex to re-implement it since we’re not using a > framework that supports it out of the box, and then of course it needs to > be templatized too. Feel free IMO take a stab at it if you want. Even if we > can’t go back to the tabs maybe some styling would be an alternative > improvement. > > Cassandra > On May 13, 2022, 2:59 PM -0500, Jason Gerlowski <[email protected]>, > wrote: > > Hey all, > > Some pages in the ref-guide display multiple code snippets in a "tabbed" > UI widget that lets readers select which of the N snippets they want to > look at. This lets us display multiple related examples in a compact way. > It's mostly used for v1/v2 API examples, etc. But starting with the 9.0 > guide, these previously tabbed snippets now appear "serially" one after > another on the page. (For an example, see: > https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/9_0/deployment-guide/collection-management.html > ) > > Does anyone know if this was intentional? If it is a bug, IMO it's not a > huge deal, or anything worth holding up the ref-guide release for. But if > it wasn't intentional I'll file a ticket and maybe take a crack for 9.1. > > Best, > > Jason > >
