Thanks Jason for spearheading this effort.

I'll be biased because I built it. So, I refrain from a vote. However, I
shall contribute constructively to the discussion



On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 9:05 PM Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I've been working over the last few months to get our "v2" API into
> shape to eventually replace (and allow us to sunset) v1.  At a high
> level the two biggest next-steps are to (1) make whatever changes we'd
> like to the v2 endpoints while they're still "experimental", and then
> (2) start using them across Solr (Admin UI, SolrJ, etc.)
>
> The big question in my mind is: what all should change in the v2
> endpoints as part of item #1 above. Do people like the current v2
> design enough to move forward as-is (or with some minor tweaking)?  Or
> is there interest in seeing a larger re-alignment around other design
> principles (e.g. REST, OpenAPI, etc.) while v2 is still
> "experimental"?
>
> My impression from past discussions is that there's interest in seeing
> broader changes to v2 (see [1] and [2] below).  I tend to agree and
> I'm willing to head up that effort.  But I wanted to double-check
> first that there was consensus on the overall idea of "broader
> changes" before I start filing JIRAs and working out specifics.
>
> Assuming consensus, my next step will be to write up the current v2
> endpoints and some proposed changes in a spreadsheet that we can
> iterate on.  (Feedback on specific APIs, changes, etc. definitely
> welcome at that point once I get there.)
>
> Best,
>
> Jason
>
> [1] "Should v2 API be experimental" -
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/t342hl7lvt5b4qmb5vrrh7tvmdjlbb22
> [2] "Solr 9.0 Release Blockers"" -
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/m7k2gvgxldkns7jqjnw1ghhqx7s3tpl1
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
>
>

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul

Reply via email to