Agreed…. > On Oct 12, 2022, at 11:45 PM, Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > > They are internal/undocumented APIs .IMHO we shoould not wait until 10.0 > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 6:26 AM Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Does our normal deprecation and backcompat policy around APIs, i.e. >> deprecate in major version (N-1) in order to remove/modify in major version >> N, apply to undocumented/internal APIs? >> >> I stumbled across an internal core-admin API (/admin/cores?action=INVOKE) >> on 'main' recently that was added in support of the "snitch" functionality >> in the Rule Based Replica Placement functionality that was removed in 9.0. >> The API eluded removal as a part of that ticket I guess, so now I'm >> wondering whether we're stuck with it until 10.0, or whether this is a >> reasonable exception to our normal backcompat policy? [1] [2] >> >> Best, >> >> Jason >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14930 - removal of RBRP in >> 9.0 >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16459 - proposed removal of >> INVOKE API >> > > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------- > Noble Paul
_______________________ Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | http://www.opensourceconnections.com <http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of whether attachments are marked as such.
