"just in time is probably less than ideal for most of the more common uses cases."
Agree On Fri, Oct 14, 2022, 9:11 PM Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don’t have much to say about the proposal, other than to say that if an > election ever ends up involving syncing up and exchanging data, doing that > just in time is probably less than ideal for most of the more common uses > cases. > > That’s just an aside though. Id be more interested in seeing the proposal > connect problems with solutions. My quick read makes me think the goal is > some dimension of scale (I’m guessing a lazy dimension, usually no the most > common Solr architecture in my experience fwiw). But I don’t see what the > problems are for that dimension of scale or how to connect proposals to > solutions to the problems. Unless I’m just missing it. >
