Sure Kevin, please proceed. Thanks.

On Thu, 20 Oct, 2022, 9:06 am Kevin Risden, <kris...@apache.org> wrote:

> Ishan - is RC1 getting built? I still see some PRS changes going into
> branch_9_1
>
> If its not too late - any issue if I backport
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16464 - mostly to get ahead of
> the questions that keep rolling in.
>
> Kevin Risden
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 8:56 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > All the blockers are now resolved and the latest build passes.
> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-check-9.1/209/
> > I'll proceed with the RC1 building shortly. Thanks to everyone!
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 2:56 PM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16463
> > >
> > > Will make a PR for 9.0
> > >
> > > Jan
> > >
> > > > 14. okt. 2022 kl. 00:56 skrev David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org>:
> > > >
> > > > Looks like we need to downgrade the Docker image to JDK 11 :-(.   Or
> > one
> > > in
> > > > between maybe.
> > > >
> > > > ~ David Smiley
> > > > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
> > > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 4:58 PM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On the users list we see several solr 9.0.0 users on Docker/k8s
> > > reporting
> > > >> frequent crashes due to a know JDK17 bug.
> > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/wg7qtkddd1t5h08okj7gm9qbrpdf0ox6
> > > >>
> > > >> Should we perhaps provide an official solr:9.0.0-temurin11 tag as a
> > > >> workaround for users?
> > > >> And also consider releasing 9.1 docker image with temurin11 as
> > default,
> > > if
> > > >> the bug is not fixed by then?
> > > >>
> > > >> Jan
> > > >>
> > > >>> 12. okt. 2022 kl. 18:48 skrev Kevin Risden <kris...@apache.org>:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16457 -
> solr.data.home
> > > set
> > > >>>> to empty string in bin/solr
> > > >>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16433 - Solr SQL
> isn't
> > > >>>> working w/ security manager enabled
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Merged and backported to branch_9_1
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Kevin Risden
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 12:32 PM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/
> > > LONDON)
> > > >> <
> > > >>> cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Merging and backporting is now complete. Thank you.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 10/12/22 17:01:02 UTC+1:00To:
> > > Christine
> > > >>>> Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON ) ,  dev@solr.apache.org
> > > >>>> Subject: Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.1.0
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Sure, please go ahead. Thanks!
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Wed, 12 Oct, 2022, 5:27 pm Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/
> > > LONDON), <
> > > >>>> cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> I'd like to also include
> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1050
> > > for
> > > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16439 bug fix please
> if
> > > >> that
> > > >>>>> is okay?
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Christine
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 10/11/22 20:11:10 UTC+1:00To:
> > > >>>>> dev@solr.apache.org
> > > >>>>> Subject: Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.1.0
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Sure Kevin, please go ahead. Noble and I are debugging a critical
> > > test
> > > >>>>> failure related to overseer (SOLR-16440) and kind of blocked at
> the
> > > >>>> moment
> > > >>>>> for the release.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Tue, 11 Oct, 2022, 10:51 pm Kevin Risden, <kris...@apache.org
> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Ishan I'm hoping to get these two jiras in for 9.1, the PRs are
> up
> > > >>>> there
> > > >>>>>> waiting for reviews and they need to run through tests. The two
> > are
> > > >>>>>> related.
> > > >>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16457 -
> > solr.data.home
> > > >>>> set
> > > >>>>> to
> > > >>>>>> empty string in bin/solr
> > > >>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16433 - Solr SQL
> > isn't
> > > >>>>>> working
> > > >>>>>> w/ security manager enabled
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Kevin Risden
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 1:41 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> > > >>>>>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16453?jql=project%20%3D%20SOLR%20AND%
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> 20(fixVersion%20%3D%209.1)%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND%20resolution%2
> > > >>>>> 0%3D%20Unresolved
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 11:10 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> > > >>>>>>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> There were lots of Blocker issues with affectsVersion as 9.1.
> I
> > > >>>>> assume
> > > >>>>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>>> intention was to have them be available in 9.1? I've changed
> > them
> > > >>>> to
> > > >>>>>>>> fixVersion = 9.1 (blocker).
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 5:17 PM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/
> > > >>>>> LONDON)
> > > >>>>>> <
> > > >>>>>>>> cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks! Merging and backporting is now complete.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 10/07/22 04:07:31 UTC+1:00To:
> > > >>>>>> Christine
> > > >>>>>>>>> Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON ) ,  dev@solr.apache.org
> > > >>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.1.0
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Sure, please go ahead.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 7 Oct, 2022, 12:15 am Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/
> > > >>>>>> LONDON), <
> > > >>>>>>>>> cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> I'd like to include
> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1051
> > > >>>> for
> > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13219 bug fix
> > please
> > > >>>>> if
> > > >>>>>>> that
> > > >>>>>>>>>> is okay?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Christine
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> From: dev@solr.apache.org At: 10/04/22 12:33:03 UTC+1:00To:
> > > >>>>>>>>>> dev@solr.apache.org
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: New branch and feature freeze for Solr 9.1.0
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> Sure, please go ahead.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> I'm concerned about the intermittent test failures. Noble is
> > > >>>>> looking
> > > >>>>>>> at
> > > >>>>>>>>> it,
> > > >>>>>>>>>> will hold off the release for now. Also, I'm out on vacation
> > for
> > > >>>>>> next
> > > >>>>>>> 3
> > > >>>>>>>>>> days (Dusshera holidays in India). Will resume the release
> > > >>>> process
> > > >>>>>>> once
> > > >>>>>>>>> I'm
> > > >>>>>>>>>> back.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 4 Oct, 2022, 12:01 am Tomás Fernández Löbbe, <
> > > >>>>>>>>>> tomasflo...@gmail.com>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to merge the PR for SOLR-16229 (
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1047) to 9.1 branch if
> > > >>>>> that's
> > > >>>>>>> OK.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Tomás
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 11:12 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> NOTICE:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Branch branch_9_1 has been cut and versions updated to 9.2
> > > >>>> on
> > > >>>>>>> stable
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> branch.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Please note the following:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * No new features may be committed to the branch without
> > > >>>>>>> discussion
> > > >>>>>>>>> on
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> the
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> dev-list.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug
> fixes
> > > >>>>> may
> > > >>>>>>> be
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> committed to the branch. However, you should submit all
> > > >>>>>> patches
> > > >>>>>>>>> you
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> want to commit to Jira first to give others the chance to
> > > >>>>>> review
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and possibly vote against the patch. Keep in mind that it
> > > >>>> is
> > > >>>>>> our
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> main intention to keep the branch as stable as possible.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should
> first
> > > >>>> be
> > > >>>>>>>>>> committed
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and
> > > >>>>>> then
> > > >>>>>>>>> into
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the current release branch.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * Normal unstable and stable branch development may
> continue
> > > >>>>> as
> > > >>>>>>>>> usual.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 9.1 and priority
> > > >>>> "Blocker"
> > > >>>>>>> will
> > > >>>>>>>>>> delay
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> a release candidate build.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to