I've opened the PR

https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1440

Some tests are still failing. I'll address them later

On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 1:56 PM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote:

> Fantastic!
> I really appreciate you working with the community on this one.
>
> ~ David Smiley
> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 6:32 PM Fikavec F <fika...@yandex.ru> wrote:
>
> > Thank you, you are very kind. I took measurements on two physical servers
> > with a 10 Gigabit link, the speed and time of full fetching 10 Gb
> > collection (one shard; empty "Accept-Encoding: " header; collection with
> > only id and string stored fields) are as follows:
> > original wt=json      -  419 Mb/s fetching time: 3m 26s
> > original wt=csv       -  463 Mb/s fetching time: 3m 6s
> > my wt=myfastjson  - 2.33 Gb/s fetching time:       37s
> > original wt=smile    - 2.38 Gb/s fetching time:       36s
> > my wt=myfastcbor  - 2.55 Gb/s fetching time:       34s
> > original wt=javabin - 2.76 Gb/s fetching time:       31s
> >
> > With "Accept-Encoding: gzip" header:
> > original wt=json      -    81  Mb/s fetching time: 12m 3s
> > my wt=myfastjson  -  114 Mb/s fetching time:    8m 32s
> >
> >    When I placed the test collection on 4 shards, wt=json worked at
> speeds
> > of about 430 Mb/s, and javabin, myfastcbor, myfastjson worked at speeds
> of
> > 5.2-6.7 Gb/s, however, before the start of data transfer, there was a
> > significant delay (possibly for data collection from individual shards
> and
> > sorting) and the final full fetching time did not exceed the above.
> > Downloading a 10 GB file from Jetty took place at a speed of 9.87 Gb/s.
> >    The time to move the cursor through the collection documents and get
> > the field values in my python application has been reduced from 4m 24s to
> > 1m 4s, moreover, half of this minute was spent to deserialization in
> python
> > from json and cbor. No failures were noticed, everything seemed to work
> as
> > before, only very quickly (4х+ faster).
> >    I dreamed of seeing Solr work at 5Gigabit+ speeds and with the help of
> > your support, everything worked out, thank you all.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> >
> >
>


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul

Reply via email to