I checked internally with my colleagues and it seems that the only issue that is near the merge point is this one:
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1435 Definitely nice to have (also to show progress in the neural search side of things) but I wouldn't say it's a blocker. I assume it will be merged in 4-5 days, it this time is reasonable I can discuss it with Elia and make it a priority so we include it in 9.2! Cheers -------------------------- *Alessandro Benedetti* Director @ Sease Ltd. *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer* *Apache Solr PMC Member* e-mail: a.benede...@sease.io *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied Consulting | Training | Open Source Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/> LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github <https://github.com/seaseltd> On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 16:58, Eric Pugh <ep...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote: > I am super close on SOLR-10466, barring any issues being raised on > review. Going to keep pushing this afternoon to get it to done. Only > thirteen more uses of the deprecated method in the test code, and honestly, > since we aren’t deleting this method in 9.2, if I don’t get the remaining > test converted today, then SOLR-10466 could still be merged. It would be > great if folks could review https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1256 < > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1256> and give me a +1/LGTM on the > work that I’ve done. > > For SOLR-8975, there are two other sub issues that aren’t SOLR010466, and > they are not anything that would block 9.2 going out. Issue SOLR-8975 is > also kind of an umbrella issue that isn’t tied to 9.2 either. > > > > > On Mar 15, 2023, at 10:58 AM, Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Hey everyone, > > > > Trying to get organized around the release. From my point of view, this > is > > the state of unfinished work: > > > > Looking at the Solr 9.2 blockers ( > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SOLR/versions/12352353), we > > currently have two: > > > > - SOLR-9168 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9168>: It > looks > > like this has a patch, that was +1'ed by Kevin, but it hasn't had > movement > > since October. > > - SOLR-8803 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8803> > (assigned > > to Shawn): This has a good amount of commits, but the comments seem > like it > > isn't done yet? > > I think this is the only thing we can't drop from this release, since > > there is already a good amount of work done in the 9.2 line. > > > > Shawn, do you still want to move forward with both of these for the 9.2 > > release? If so, do you have a timeline? > > > > From this thread: > > > > - SOLR-8975, SOLR-10466: Eric, how are these coming along, do you still > > want to get them in for this release? > > - Alessandro, how are your issues coming along, do you think they > should > > be merged in.a few days? Also do you have links to the JIRAs? > > > > If this is all wrapped up, I'll start the release tomorrow. > > > > - Houston > > > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 1:02 PM Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > >> Hey everyone, > >> > >> I'm planning on cutting the branch today, and seeing what our blockers > >> look like. > >> > >> Once again, please ensure the JIRAs that must make it into 9.2 have the > >> blocker attribute added. > >> Otherwise I'm going to move forward in a few days, unless there are > issues > >> that we see arise. > >> > >> - Houston > >> > >> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 1:06 PM Alessandro Benedetti < > a.benede...@sease.io> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> I have some issues my team is working on, and we would potentially > love to > >>> see them in 9.2 . > >>> But I don't want to block anything and I suspect they'll get merged by > the > >>> end of this week. > >>> > >>> Any estimation for the branch cut? So we may potentially include them. > >>> > >>> Cheers > >>> -------------------------- > >>> *Alessandro Benedetti* > >>> Director @ Sease Ltd. > >>> *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer* > >>> *Apache Solr PMC Member* > >>> > >>> e-mail: a.benede...@sease.io > >>> > >>> > >>> *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied > >>> Consulting | Training | Open Source > >>> > >>> Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/> > >>> LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter > >>> <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube > >>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github > >>> <https://github.com/seaseltd> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 19:08, Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> I'll cut the branch in a few days, so go for it and merge tomorrow. > >>> Please > >>>> do add 9.2 as the Fix Version so that we can track this correctly. > >>>> > >>>> - Houston > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 1:06 PM Andy Webb <andywebb1...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> hi Houston, > >>>>> > >>>>> I have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16643 in progress > - > >>>>> would > >>>>> like that to go into 9.2 if possible, but it's not critical. I'm away > >>> so > >>>>> won't be in a position to merge that until this time tomorrow at the > >>>>> earliest. It'll also be my first commit, and I want to make sure I'm > >>>> doing > >>>>> it right! I'm intending to join the Meetup to say hi to folk, could > >>> chat > >>>>> about it then. > >>>>> > >>>>> thanks, > >>>>> Andy > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 15:18, Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org> > >>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hey everyone, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I am officially back and ready to begin the process for 9.2. How > >>> are we > >>>>>> doing with regards to blockers right now? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> So I see 4 tickets that are tagged to 9.2 in JIRA but not > >>> completed. Do > >>>>> we > >>>>>> have updates for these items? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> - SOLR-16653 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16653> > >>>>>> - SOLR-9168 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9168> > >>>>>> - SOLR-8803 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8803> > >>>>>> - SOLR-16681 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681> > >>>>>> (mentioned > >>>>>> above) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I also see work going on for the Lucene 9.5 upgrade. Do we want to > >>>> block > >>>>>> 9.2 on this upgrade, or do we want to wait for 9.3? I think I am > >>>> leaning > >>>>>> towards including Lucene 9.5 in Solr 9.2, but if we don't think it's > >>>>>> feasible we can move forward without it. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> - Houston > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 3:49 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I’m ok with documenting it as a limitation as a first step + > >>> throw a > >>>>> http > >>>>>>> 400 error. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Jan Høydahl > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 1. mar. 2023 kl. 08:21 skrev Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org > >>>> : > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hello, colleagues! > >>>>>>>> How can we triage > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681 > >>>>>>>> Replacing uniqueKey field via fl doesn't work since 9.0? > >>>>>>>> I don't have an elegant solution. Will we just declare it as a > >>>> known > >>>>>>>> bug/limitation? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 9:07 PM Houston Putman < > >>>> hous...@apache.org> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Hey everyone, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> It's been a while since Solr 9.1 was released, and we have a > >>> ton > >>>> of > >>>>>>> great > >>>>>>>>> things to show off in 9.2: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> - Jetty 10 > >>>>>>>>> - JAX-RS > >>>>>>>>> - Lucene 9.5 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I volunteer to do the release starting in the week of March > >>> 6th, > >>>>>> unless > >>>>>>>>> anyone else objects or wants to do it themselves. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> - Houston > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> Sincerely yours > >>>>>>>> Mikhail Khludnev > >>>>>>>> https://t.me/MUST_SEARCH > >>>>>>>> A caveat: Cyrillic! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org > >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > _______________________ > Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | > http://www.opensourceconnections.com < > http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy < > http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal> > Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed < > https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw> > > This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be > Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of > whether attachments are marked as such. > >
