+1 in doing it starting in 10, I don't think it's urgent and I like consistency!
Cheers -------------------------- *Alessandro Benedetti* Director @ Sease Ltd. *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer* *Apache Solr PMC Member* e-mail: a.benede...@sease.io *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied Consulting | Training | Open Source Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/> LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github <https://github.com/seaseltd> On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 at 16:46, Houston Putman <houstonput...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I'm working on the Slim solr distribution ( > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16742) and I noticed that the > Solr src release unpacks to a directory without "-src" appended. > > E.g. solr-9.2.0-src.tgz will unpack to solr-9.2.0/ instead of > solr-9.2.0-src/ > > I'm sure this is just how it was done originally, and no one thought to > change it. > Does anyone have historical reasons as to why this is the case? > > I'd like to be able to treat all of our release artifacts consistently, so > that they unpack to a folder that matches the name of the distribution. > Are there any objections to changing this starting in 10? > It's not a huge change, but probably something we shouldn't do midway > through 9. > However, if people think we should change sooner rather than later, I'm > fine with that. > > - Houston >
