I wanted to bring up SOLR-16807 ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16807) because its turning out to be a pretty big thorn in my side at the moment. Enough so that I'm considering proposing a bug fix release.
The issue is that a catch all (*) copyfield is incompatible with an index that contains a DenseVectorField. On the surface this sounds not too bad, but if you have an application that relies on a catch-all copy field this becomes a blocker to using the DenseVector Field.
