> * JSON file: bin/solr post -url http://localhost:8983/wizbang/update
events.json
> * XML files: bin/solr post -url http://localhost:8983/records/update
article*.xml
> * CSV file: bin/solr post -url http://localhost:8983/signals/update
LATEST-signals.csv
> * Directory of files: bin/solr post -url
http://localhost:8983/myfiles/update ~/Documents
> * Web crawl: bin/solr post -url
http://localhost:8983/gettingstarted/update https://solr.apache.org/
-recursive 1 -delay 1
> * Standard input (stdin): echo '{commit: {}}' | bin/solr post -url
http://localhost:8983/my_collection/update -type application/json -out yes
-d
> * Data as string: bin/solr post -url http://localhost:8983/signals/update
-type text/csv -out yes -d $'id,value\n1,0.47'

AFAICT, most of them can be achieved through bash/curl with one liners.
Bash is supported on Windows, Mac OS and GNU/Linux. Am I missing something?

On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 11:34, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:

> We have advertised the post tool in the past in our examples/tutorials.
> Difficult to erase all traces of it from the web.
> It is better to remove the tool from the Solr distro, and, maybe, relocate
> it to the sandbox/extras repo, from where a user can consciously choose to
> download and use it if needed.
>
> If we have proper documentation, I don't see how anyone building POCs will
> miss out on the post tool. Is there a use case that users can't achieve
> easily through a documented method that the post tool caters to?
>
> On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 11:25, David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Ishan, your beliefs surprise me.  Maybe I'm misunderstanding your point of
>> view... is the key word of your response "advertise" and we can then
>> debate
>> what that means?  In other words, are you saying bin/post (and other
>> things
>> you don't think should be used in production) should not exist at all or
>> we
>> should be very careful about how we "advertise" its existence?  I think
>> features that help people build POCs / explore / learn are good things,
>> even if not used typically in production.  At times we over-advertised
>> features without enough disclaimers on the suitability of the feature in
>> question.
>>
>> ~ David Smiley
>> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 10:09 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > Ishan, you did not give an argument for why you believe bin/post
>> should
>> > go away. Do you feel it is better to document all the cURL commands to
>> be
>> > more "standard"?
>> >
>> > Precisely! We should never advertise anything that shouldn't be used at
>> > scale or in production. That includes the post tool, example modes of
>> > startup, schemaless/data-driven etc.
>> >
>> > Curl is popular enough on Windows as well, through ports or WSL. There
>> are
>> > tools like Insomnia or Postman too. We should encourage their use,
>> rather
>> > than promote our home grown tool by shipping oob and/or referring to it
>> in
>> > tutorials.
>> >
>> > On Tue, 23 May, 2023, 3:26 am David Smiley, <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > > *If* bin/solr is to subsume bin/post, I think it deserves its own
>> issue;
>> > > should not be a detail of SOLR-6994 -- "Implement Windows version of
>> > > bin/post".  Really; wow that'd be sneaky to do something so visible to
>> > > users / documentation under a OS/platform compatibility oriented
>> title.
>> > >
>> > > I am strongly not a fan of having bin/solr subsume bin/post.
>> bin/post is
>> > > very distinct enough in purpose to remain separate.  The stated
>> > motivation
>> > > seems out of convenience to Solr internal workings, which doesn't
>> serve
>> > the
>> > > user's best interests IMO.
>> > >
>> > > ~ David Smiley
>> > > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
>> > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 7:33 AM Eric Pugh <
>> > ep...@opensourceconnections.com
>> > > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi all,
>> > > >
>> > > > As part of SOLR-6994 I’m migrating the SimplePostTool to be part of
>> > > > bin/solr commands.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > We document a number of example use cases:
>> > > >
>> > > > * JSON file: bin/solr post -url
>> http://localhost:8983/wizbang/update
>> > > > events.json
>> > > > * XML files: bin/solr post -url
>> http://localhost:8983/records/update
>> > > > article*.xml
>> > > > * CSV file: bin/solr post -url http://localhost:8983/signals/update
>> > > > LATEST-signals.csv
>> > > > * Directory of files: bin/solr post -url
>> > > > http://localhost:8983/myfiles/update ~/Documents
>> > > > * Web crawl: bin/solr post -url
>> > > > http://localhost:8983/gettingstarted/update
>> https://solr.apache.org/
>> > > > -recursive 1 -delay 1
>> > > > * Standard input (stdin): echo '{commit: {}}' | bin/solr post -url
>> > > > http://localhost:8983/my_collection/update -type application/json
>> -out
>> > > > yes -d
>> > > > * Data as string: bin/solr post -url
>> > > http://localhost:8983/signals/update
>> > > > -type text/csv -out yes -d $'id,value\n1,0.47'
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > The last two, stdin and data as a string,  feel rather obscure to
>> me,
>> > and
>> > > > I’d like to not port them over to being supported by the bin/solr
>> post
>> > > tool
>> > > > equivalent.    Thoughts?
>> > > >
>> > > > Eric
>> > > > _______________________
>> > > > Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC |
>> 434.466.1467
>> > |
>> > > > http://www.opensourceconnections.com <
>> > > > http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <
>> > > > http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
>> > > > Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered
>> to
>> > be
>> > > > Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless
>> of
>> > > > whether attachments are marked as such.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to