Ah, thanks! That was not intuitive at all :-) On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 at 14:25, Thomas Corthals <tho...@klascement.net> wrote:
> Hi Ishan, > > If you want a JSON object with key => value pairs instead of a JSON array > with alternating keys and values in the response, you can add &json.nl=map > to your request. > > > https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/query-guide/response-writers.html#json-nl > > > Thomas > > Op zo 16 jul 2023 om 01:41 schreef Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com>: > > > I used classic facets after a long time, and observed that the > facet.field > > results in a list of alternating keys and values: > > > > https://gist.github.com/chatman/e475d8fe8e2bf1d7890aa7f75768865e > > > > "facet_counts":{ > > "facet_queries":{}, > > "facet_fields":{ > > "unknownField":[ > > "val",1, > > "val2",1] > > }, > > } > > > > Shouldn't it have been something like the following? > > > > "unknownField": {"val": 1, "val2": 1} > > > > Not sure if the current behaviour is intentional, but going forward does > it > > make sense to change to the latter? I do understand that the JSON Facets > > API does the reasonable thing already. > > >
