FWIW I used 9.2 guide to explore collection API https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/configuration-guide/v2-api.html#v2-api-path-prefixes mentions or equivalently: /api/c but when I post curl -X POST http://localhost:8983/api/c -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d ' { I got "msg": "Cannot find API for the path: /c", then https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/deployment-guide/collection-management.html#create has create object in body but if I follow the guide "msg": "Unrecognized field \"create\" (class org.apache.solr.handler.admin.api.CreateCollectionAPI$CreateCollectionRequestBody), not marked as ignorable (17 known properties: \"pullReplicas\",
Are these issues fixed in the current guide already? On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:59 PM Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org> wrote: > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Solr 9.3.0 > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.3.0-RC1-rev-d07751cfaa8065bea8bd43f59e758e50d50c2419 > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.3.0-RC1-rev-d07751cfaa8065bea8bd43f59e758e50d50c2419 > > You can build a release-candidate of the official docker images (full & > slim) using the following command: > > SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER= > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.3.0-RC1-rev-d07751cfaa8065bea8bd43f59e758e50d50c2419/solr > && > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.3.0-RC1-rev-d07751cfaa8065bea8bd43f59e758e50d50c2419/solr&&> > \ > docker build $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/9.3.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-full > \ > --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \ > -t solr-rc:9.3.0-1 && \ > docker build $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/9.3.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-slim > \ > --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \ > -t solr-rc:9.3.0-1-slim > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2023-07-18 20:00 > UTC. > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Here is my +1 > -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev