>> collection.configName > Where is this used as a system property override? I looked and don't see > it.
Yea, this should not have been in the list. Removed > "enabled" vs "disabled": can we standardize on "enabled"? That would have been nice. I think typically .enabled is used when default is disabled and .disabled is used when default is enabled. >> managed.schema.mutable > > In this case (and likely others if I found one), there is no production > code containing this string. It is only a test config file containing > ${managed.schema.mutable} and probably test code that sets it. I don't > think we should put these in the list; the list is long enough as it is. Yep, I moved that line down to the "Test code" section of the table. I should have filtered my regex scan on non-test code.. >> disable.configEdit. => solr.configset.edit.disabled > We should then broaden its use to cover the configset broadly, thus block > the schema edit API and maybe more. Right now it only covers mutability of > solrconfig.xml (via a JSON overlay). I'm good with that, but it increases > the scope. Yes, self descriptive naming is a goal. Rather change the names in this effort than change the functionality. Jan