I think this is assumed from the discussion above, but because the
releaseWizard suggests a formal "FAILED" email:

This vote has FAILED.

Reason for fail is: re-spinning the release for SOLR-17149.

On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 1:55 PM Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> It's probably cleanest to create a new ticket of type="bug", and then link
> back to SOLR-16879 - that way the "Fix Version" field can be unambiguous.
>
> On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 1:33 PM Pierre Salagnac <pierre.salag...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your input.
>> Unfortunately there is no parameter for that. This is hardcoded at 5.
>>
>> Yes, I'm already working on a fix.
>>
>> Sorry to hijack this thread for the 9.5 release... Is a new Jira required
>> for such an issue?
>> I'm unclear with this, since the regression was introduced in a version
>> that is already released.
>>
>>
>> Le lun. 5 févr. 2024 à 19:03, Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com> a
>> écrit :
>>
>> > Interesting - 9.4 has been out there since October, I'm surprised no one
>> > reported this earlier.  But I guess there's always a lag for teams to
>> > upgrade to new versions...
>> >
>> > Is the number of "expensive" tasks configurable, such that there's a
>> > workaround for collections with many shards?  Assuming not, this does
>> sound
>> > serious enough to "fail" the VOTE as it'd mean that backup/restore is
>> > essentially broken for sufficiently large collections.
>> >
>> > In terms of SOLR-16879 - any chance you're willing to work on a fix
>> Pierre?
>> >
>> > Best,
>> >
>> > Jason
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 12:52 PM Pierre Salagnac <
>> pierre.salag...@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > The regression was introduced in 9.4.
>> > >
>> > > Le lun. 5 févr. 2024 à 18:31, Pierre Salagnac <
>> pierre.salag...@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > > a
>> > > écrit :
>> > >
>> > > > Hi Jason,
>> > > >
>> > > > A regression was introduced in backup/restore for large collections.
>> > This
>> > > > was reported in a comment of SOLR-16879[1].
>> > > > Should this be considered as a blocker for 9.5 ?
>> > > >
>> > > > [1]
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16879?focusedCommentId=17813066&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17813066
>> > > >
>> > > > Le lun. 5 févr. 2024 à 15:44, Jason Gerlowski <
>> gerlowsk...@apache.org>
>> > a
>> > > > écrit :
>> > > >
>> > > >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Solr 9.5.0
>> > > >>
>> > > >> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.5.0-RC1-rev-1fb7d127fc064b0bab8435a431d71a44050e654b
>> > > >>
>> > > >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.5.0-RC1-rev-1fb7d127fc064b0bab8435a431d71a44050e654b
>> > > >>
>> > > >> You can build a release-candidate of the official docker images
>> (full
>> > &
>> > > >> slim) using the following command:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.5.0-RC1-rev-1fb7d127fc064b0bab8435a431d71a44050e654b/solr
>> > > >> &&
>> > > >> <
>> > >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.5.0-RC1-rev-1fb7d127fc064b0bab8435a431d71a44050e654b/solr&&;
>> > > >
>> > > >> \
>> > > >>   docker build
>> > > >> $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/9.5.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-full \
>> > > >>     --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \
>> > > >>     -t solr-rc:9.5.0-1 && \
>> > > >>   docker build
>> > > >> $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/9.5.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-slim \
>> > > >>     --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \
>> > > >>     -t solr-rc:9.5.0-1-slim
>> > > >>
>> > > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2024-02-08
>> > 15:00
>> > > >> UTC.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> [ ] +1  approve
>> > > >> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> > > >> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Here is my +1
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to