I agree - the fact that it's gone so long without an update suggests
it's better off relying on the ref-guide alone.

That said - I love the idea of keeping deprecations all in a table
like this.  Much easier to find a feature-of-interest at a glance than
it is on the "Major Changes" page IMO.  Maybe an idea to bring into
the ref-guide at some point: a "deprecations" sub-page that makes use
of a similar table.

On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 8:40 AM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Officially, such information would be in our "major changes in" Solr Ref
> Guide pages.  It was probably a working/temporary one useful as we
> approached 9.0.  After all, it's way easier to edit a wiki page than to do
> all the steps involved in updating our Ref Guide or any other part of our
> Git repo.
>
> I suggest deleting that old page unless you'd like to clear it and have it
> oriented on Solr 10.  But I doubt it'd ever be so grand as Solr 9 in terms
> of the scale deprecations/removals.  So I don't think we need it, at least
> not a dedicated page for it.  Notable deprecations (entire modules or
> features) could just be a list on the Roadmap in a Solr 10 section maybe.
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 6:25 AM David Eric Pugh <de...@yahoo.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > I think this wiki page is rather out of date, and maybe has served it's
> > purpose?   Do we want to maintain it?
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/Deprecations
> > I think it came out of the last big effort to deprecate stuff.
> > Eric
> >

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org

Reply via email to