I don't mind Solr being a "webapp" in Jetty.  I don't recall it
constraining us or being interfering.  Jetty is very customizable so we can
tweak the Jetty-Solr relationship to our liking.  A webapp makes it
straightforward (no code!) for other users to add a CORS Filter in Solr or
to add another webapp if they like.

On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 1:30 PM Chris Hostetter <hoss...@apache.org> wrote:

>
> : I suspect the choice of a ServletFilter vs Servlet was done for reasons
> : that might have made sense forever-ago.  It has always been weird.  Does
> it
> : still make sense?  Maybe Hossman remembers.
>
> Once upon a time (before solr even supported multi-core) there was a
> SolrServlet bound to /select and a SolrUpdateServlet bound to /update,
> while the admin UI was handled by JSPs (that were
> directly accessible via their file names: schema.jsp etc..)
>
> You could use different request handlers via the 'qt' param on /select
> requests, but there was no way to customize the handling of /update
> requests.
>
> SOLR-104 introduced the "SolrDispatchFilter" -- bound to "/*" -- and the
> ability to configure (and use) request handlers by path (for both search
> and updates)
>
> The reason it was a "Filter" was so it could ignore any path that was
> *NOT* a registered request handler and pass it down the chain -- this was
> important not only for the Admin UI JSP pages, but for things like legacy
> requests to "/update" to get the deprecated SolrUpdateServlet if the users
> config didn't define an "/update" request handler.
>
> (This was also back in the day when "customizing the solr webapp" was not
> only supported it was encouraged, so the passthrough behavior was
> important for other reasosn as well)
>
>
> Frankly, at this point, i'm not sure why it matters or makes sense to
> worry about wether it's a dispatch filter or a servlet -- if the concern
> is the logging or error handling just rip out the passthough behavior and
> put whatever new behavior you want in the SolrDispatchFilter and avoid
> the complexity of the rename.
>
> If we really want to overhaul the SolrDispatchFilter, let's go whole
> hog, rip out all the servlet APIs and stop being a webapp :)
>
>
>
> -Hoss
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to