There is definitely a need to allow users to transition away from javax. Am
traveling today but there is a blocker for 10x for that. Pls look it up...
(would but limited to phone at the moment)

On Tue, Dec 3, 2024, 11:21 AM gerlowskija (via GitHub) <g...@apache.org>
wrote:

>
> gerlowskija commented on code in PR #2876:
> URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2876#discussion_r1868027727
>
>
> ##########
> solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/api/V2HttpCall.java:
> ##########
> @@ -434,7 +434,12 @@ protected void executeCoreRequest(SolrQueryResponse
> rsp) {
>          // SolrCore counter
>          core.close();
>          core = null;
> -        response.getHeaderNames().stream().forEach(name ->
> response.setHeader(name, null));
> +        // Skip specific headers
> +        // workaround for response.setHeader(name, null)
> +        response.getHeaderNames().stream()
>
> Review Comment:
>    This looks good for now IMO.
>
>    Longer term I'd love to see this code go away in favor of having the v2
> API stuff get handled by its own servlet, but we're pretty far from that
> being workable for now.  It is a little hacky in the interim though 😦
>
>
>
> --
> This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
> To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
> URL above to go to the specific comment.
>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
>
> For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
> us...@infra.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to