At a glance the PR seems like a relatively safe backport, since it's introducing a new module that's relatively isolated and "off by default". It's also a really cool feature that'd be awesome to get in! I'm not the RM, but I'd love to see it get backported!
Best, Jason On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 11:25 AM Alessandro Benedetti <a.benede...@sease.io> wrote: > > Is it too late to add: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2809 to 9.8? > I'm ready to merge and wanted to adjust the CHANGES.txt and the back-port > consequentially! > > Let me know, it would definitely be a feature that will make some > noise, even at its first version. > > Cheers > > -------------------------- > *Alessandro Benedetti* > Director @ Sease Ltd. > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer* > *Apache Solr PMC Member* > > e-mail: a.benede...@sease.io > > > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied > Consulting | Training | Open Source > > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/> > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github > <https://github.com/seaseltd> > > > On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 at 10:36, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> wrote: > > > That sounds good to me. > > > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 1:36 AM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Anshum, > > > I'd like to deprecate some methods that I will be removing in main: > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2898 for some > > > ClusterState/DocCollection/Replica methods > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2856 for SimpleMap and more: > > > > > > SOLR-14680: NamedList, deprecating methods: forEachEntry, forEachKey, > > > abortableForEachKey, abortableForEach, > > > asMap (no-arg only), get(key, default). Added getOrDefault. > > > Deprecated the SimpleMap interface as well as the > > > entirety of the SolrJ package org.apache.solr.cluster.api, which > > > wasn't used except for SimpleMap. > > > > > > That PR actually makes the deletions (and adding getOrDefault) but I'd > > like > > > to quickly throw up a PR that only does what that CHANGES.txt says. > > > > > > None of this will be disruptive. Assuming I get both PRs ready tonight, > > > does this sound fine? > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 2:51 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > We are in a good place to kick off the 9.8.0 release. > > > > > > > > I plan to* cut-off the 9.8 branch on 9th Dec, Monday*. That should get > > > us a > > > > few days for things to stabilize before building the RC for us to vote > > > on. > > > > > > > > Please let me know if you have any concerns or questions. > > > > > > > > -Anshum > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Anshum Gupta > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
