Hi Christos, sorry for the confusion, with error prone I literally meant
it's easy to make mistakes when editing the file (writing the entry for the
wrong release, maybe confusion between a new feature or a fix ect.
No reference to google error-prone :)
--------------------------
*Alessandro Benedetti*
Director @ Sease Ltd.
*Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
*Apache Solr PMC Member*

e-mail: a.benede...@sease.io


*Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
Consulting | Training | Open Source

Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
<https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
<https://github.com/seaseltd>


On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 at 09:43, Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote:

> Good news, a new release is on its way, including a CLI tool <
> https://github.com/logchange/logchange/pull/31> independent from maven.
> This means we could integrate it into our process with simple commands like
> ./logchange release --version 9.8.0
> ... which will move yml files from folder "unreleased" into folder "v9.8.0"
> and then generate CHANGELOG.md with ./logchange generate.
>
> See https://github.com/logchange/logchange/tree/main/changelog for how the
> strucuture looks like.
>
> Jan
>
> > 19. des. 2024 kl. 20:34 skrev David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org>:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 7:30 PM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> This tool does what is proposed here and looks promising:
> >> https://github.com/logchange/logchange?tab=readme-ov-file
> >>
> >> It requires us to switch to CHANGES.md and it lacks a gradle plugin. But
> >> we could probably contribute some changes to fit our needs..
> >>
> >
> > We don't require a gradle plugin.  Arguably it should have been done as
> > simple scripts without being tied to any build system.  There's even a
> TODO
> > on its main page that refers to a Docker version.  I could imagine one of
> > us essentially doing this (creating the Dockerfile and any scripts) so
> that
> > it can more easily be run; maybe tailored for us.
>
>

Reply via email to