+1 (binding)

SUCCESS! [0:37:10.192767]


I also ran the solr operator integration tests with it:

Ran 27 of 28 Specs in 509.267 seconds
> SUCCESS! -- 27 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 1 Skipped


It was very hard to get the docker image to build, because GPG behaves a
little differently now.
But that's something we can fix before pushing to the official-images repo
(and does not affect building docker images from the src artifact), so it
won't affect my vote.

- Houston

On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 1:56 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@apache.org> wrote:

> Please vote for release candidate 1 for *Solr 9.8.0*
>
> *The artifacts can be downloaded from:*
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.8.0-RC1-rev-8bf0100e502ade4b8161e4b90f762b117a6ef442
>
>
> If you're running on MacOS, due to an update to the integration tests, you
> would need to install coreutils (for the timeout command) for the smoke
> test to run successfully.
>
> *You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:*
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.8.0-RC1-rev-8bf0100e502ade4b8161e4b90f762b117a6ef442
>
> *You can build a release-candidate of the official docker images (full &
> slim) using the following command:*
>
> SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.8.0-RC1-rev-8bf0100e502ade4b8161e4b90f762b117a6ef442/solr
> &&
> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.8.0-RC1-rev-8bf0100e502ade4b8161e4b90f762b117a6ef442/solr&&;>
> \
>   docker build $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/9.8.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-full
> \
>     --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \
>     -t solr-rc:9.8.0-1 && \
>   docker build $SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER/9.8.0/docker/Dockerfile.official-slim
> \
>     --build-arg SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER=$SOLR_DOWNLOAD_SERVER \
>     -t solr-rc:9.8.0-1-slim
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2025-01-17 20:00
> UTC.
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Here is my +1
>
>
> -Anshum
>

Reply via email to