I've also put together some "draft" release notes for the 0.9.0
release here: 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/Solr+Operator+Release+Notes+v0.9.0

Would love some review or improvements on those if anyone gets a
chance to take a look!

Best,

Jason

On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 4:45 PM Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Branch release-0.9 has been cut and versions updated to v0.10 on the
> stable branch!
>
> Since no one has any other work they're looking to get in, I'll start
> work on RC1 immediately and if things go smoothly our "feature freeze"
> will be rather tiny.  But during that time, please observe the
> following rules:
>
> * No new features may be committed to the branch.
> * Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug fixes may be
>   committed to the branch. However, you should submit all issues/PRs you
>   want to commit to Github first to give others the chance to review
>   and possibly vote against the PR. Keep in mind that it is our
>   main intention to keep the branch as stable as possible.
> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed
>   to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into
>   the current release branch.
> * Normal unstable and stable branch development may continue as usual.
>   However, if you plan to commit a big change to the unstable branch
>   while the branch feature freeze is in effect, think twice: can't the
>   addition wait a couple more days? Merges of bug fixes into the branch
>   may become more difficult.
> * Only Github issues with Milestone v0.9.0 and priority "Blocker" will delay
>   a release candidate build.
>
> Best,
>
> Jason
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 4:24 PM Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Jan!
> >
> > I took a crack to try and wrap that up and made some (slight)
> > progress!  But Houston and I uncovered an edge case that's fixable but
> > adds some complexity.  (More detail in the GH PR:
> > https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/pull/674). So a bit of a "two
> > steps forward, one step back" situation.
> >
> > Given that, I might start on 0.9.0 without waiting for #674, unless
> > there are strong objections or new volunteers to help polish it off?
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Jason
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 3:18 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 I'm not actively working on anything, but pinged #674 to see if it can 
> > > be landed.
> > >
> > > Jan
> > >
> > > > 9. jan. 2025 kl. 18:13 skrev Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > Hey all,
> > > >
> > > > The operator has accumulated a nice few bug-fixes and improvements
> > > > since our 0.8.1 release back in the Spring.  What do we think about
> > > > doing an operator release in the coming weeks?
> > > >
> > > > If so, is anyone actively working on things that they'd hope to finish
> > > > up before that happens?
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > >
> > > > Jason
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
> > >

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org

Reply via email to