I'm not opposed to further 9.x feature releases, as long as someone are willing to put in the work. But I don't think such a decision should slow down our move to Java 21 in 10.x.
Excited about 10.0 materializing. Jan > 15. apr. 2025 kl. 16:39 skrev Houston Putman <hous...@apache.org>: > > I think that this is the biggest benefit of the lucene split, and I am 100% > in support. 9x can continue being supported while maintainers want to add > new features, but there is no guarantee that things be backported (other > than security and bad bug) or that releases happen. > > Other projects do this and I think its a very successful way of > transitioning between major versions. > > Im also excited for a 10.0, and think we should try to cut it in the summer > and get all of the breaking changes we want in beforehand. We can > prioritize those since we will still be releasing the 9x line potentially > going forward. > > - Houston > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 11:00 PM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Is it controversial to propose that a 10.0 release need not imply the end >> of 9.x minor releases? I would like us to be okay with additional minor >> releases; and I'm not sure why anyone would block this proposal either. >> Eventually, practically speaking, too few of us will care about maintaining >> the 9.x line, and the minor releases will cease. Those of us that don't >> want to be burdened with another major branch still being open need not >> feel compelled to back-port changes there. Heck; that's true today. >> >> ~ David >> >> On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 9:39 AM Jason Gerlowski <gerlowsk...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hey, >>> >>> Yes - I think penciling in a timeline is a great idea, it'll give devs >>> notice around any work that they were hoping to get in. And July in >>> particular sounds like a realistic (if distant) target. I'd love to >>> see 10.0 happen a little sooner if the blockers get cleared away in >>> time, but that's probably unrealistic on my part. >>> >>> Anecdotally, I know some folks have things that they'd like to see >>> deprecated in a 9.x release before 10.0 goes out the door. Is it >>> worth penciling in a tentative date for a 9.x release, so those folks >>> know when their deprecations/changes need to be in? Say, early June? >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Jason >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 3:17 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi everyone, >>>> >>>> I think it's time we start planning for Solr 10. Lucene 10 was >>>> released almost 6 months ago and it makes a lot of sense for Solr to >>>> release a corresponding version that has all the good stuff from >>>> Lucene 10. >>>> >>>> I would like to target a July release for Solr 10, giving everyone >>>> about 3 months - one of which should be to stabilize and test our >>>> release for the most part. >>>> >>>> And yes, I'd like to also volunteer to be the RM. >>>> >>>> -Anshum >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org
