I agree with all the "HTTP" renames proposed here. I do want to point out that with the Load Balanced client, we opted to make `LBHttp2SolrClient` work with both the Jetty and JDK client variants. (see https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2828) My hope is that the same can be done for both `CloudSolrClient` and `ClusterStateProvider`. For these more-advanced clients that really just layer on more functionality, we should try not have a bespoke variant for each underlying base client implementation. With that in mind, the less-specific the naming the better.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
