Unfortunately I'm job travelling and will have difficulties with joining,
but I second what Kevin said, great job done on progressing with all the
tasks on the board (which is almost completed now).
I wish you a good meeting and please write short recap so that I can catch
up!

Great!

--------------------------
*Alessandro Benedetti*
Director @ Sease Ltd.
*Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
*Apache Solr Chair of PMC*

e-mail: [email protected]


*Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
Consulting | Training | Open Source

Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
<https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
<https://github.com/seaseltd>

On Mon, 3 Nov 2025, 19:10 Rahul Goswami, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Excited for the cuVS GPU support demo if that happening!
>
> Rahul
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 3:37 PM Kevin Liang (BLOOMBERG/ 919 3RD A) <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Correction: with daylight savings adjustment, it should be 5:00pm GMT
> >
> > From: [email protected] At: 10/30/25 15:35:31 UTC-4:00To:
> > [email protected]
> > Subject: Reminder - Dense Vector Group Monthly Meeting
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Reminder that we will be holding our monthly dense vector meeting next
> > Wednesday,
> > November 5th at the usual time of 9:00am PT, 12:00pm ET, 4:00pm GMT.
> >
> > Meeting video conference link: https://meet.google.com/cap-torz-bej
> >
> > People are encouraged to come with topics you would like to present or
> > discuss
> > (@Ishan do you still want to demo cuVS GPU support?).
> >
> > I think the current board of tagged work is almost entirely completed
> > (with
> > many of these changes releasing in Solr 10)! Great work by everyone
> > involved
> > including contributions to general discussion. Perhaps we should also
> > start
> > brainstorming what may be aspirational targets for the next round of work
> > in
> > the AI/vector space.
> >
> > See you all Wednesday,
> >
> > -Kevin
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to