note: there are branch protection rules that prevent release branches from
being deleted.  Be my guest if you can get around it.

On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 1:27 PM Houston Putman <[email protected]> wrote:

> Sorry, I was wrong on which thing was breaking. We can't build a reference
> guide with the unreleased branches:
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/solr-reference-guide-nightly/
>
> But awesome, I think that's the right course of action.
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 9:42 PM David Smiley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I don't understand the ref guide issues you speak of, but nonetheless,
> > delete and re-create later makes sense to me.
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 6:52 PM Houston Putman <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Are there any differences in branch_9_11 so far? If so we should
> probably
> > > just delete it right? Then we can recreate it when you want to start
> the
> > > release again.
> > >
> > > Right now we can't build the ref guide because two branches have the
> 9.11
> > > version (branch_9x and branch_9_11), so we need to either delete
> > > branch_9_11 or run the releaseWizard steps to setup branch_9x to point
> to
> > > 9.12.0
> > >
> > > - Houston
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 11:38 AM David Smiley <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > When I want to restore the feature freeze, I expect I can simply
> merge
> > > > branch_9x into branch_9_11 at that time to sync it.  The intent is to
> > > save
> > > > myself and others time from backporting all the way to branch_9_11
> when
> > > we
> > > > can stop after cherry-picking to branch_9x, knowing the merge will
> > > > eventually handle the rest.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, May 27, 2026 at 5:24 PM David Smiley <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm suspending the feature-freeze declaration on 9.11.
> > > > > The 9.11 release is delayed to ensure some security matters get
> > > > > addressed.  I'll update this thread when it's back-on.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, May 17, 2026 at 12:16 AM David Smiley <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Sure
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 2:54 PM Eric Pugh <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> David, any chance the fix for
> > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-18239 could make it
> in?
> > > > >>>  I've backported to branch_9x.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> The PR is https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/4427 and the
> commit
> > > hash
> > > > >>> is b7aeda98b8477ea12a61f979344054e20fd0b342
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Eric
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On 2026/05/02 05:38:22 David Smiley wrote:
> > > > >>> > The smoketester very likely fails because I have yet to do the
> > > > >>> changelog
> > > > >>> > part of the release process.  I'll disable the build until I'm
> > > ready
> > > > >>> for
> > > > >>> > that.
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > I'm not sure how we'll get a new/straggler unreleased changelog
> > > > entries
> > > > >>> > onto an already-generated release changelog unless maybe we
> leave
> > > the
> > > > >>> > "unreleased" entries there until the release has truly
> happened.
> > > But
> > > > >>> this
> > > > >>> > portion of the release wizard wants to do seemingly all
> changelog
> > > > >>> related
> > > > >>> > things instead of merely generating the new changelog.
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 12:51 PM David Smiley <
> > [email protected]>
> > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > > My release process notes from using the release wizard:
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>> > > My macOS system python3 didn't have some
> dependencies/modules,
> > > so I
> > > > >>> had to
> > > > >>> > > install the requirements.txt.  I'm very unfamiliar with
> python
> > > dev
> > > > >>> > > practices in this regard... I wound up creating a venv and
> > thus I
> > > > ran
> > > > >>> > > python via
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > /Users/dsmiley/DevSearch/solr_9x/dev-tools/scripts/.venv/bin/python3.
> > > > >>> > > However, some release wizard commands like invoking
> > > > >>> `addDepsToChanges.py`
> > > > >>> > > didn't work OOTB because it didn't know about my venv.  I'm
> not
> > > > sure
> > > > >>> how
> > > > >>> > > the script or my approach should be updated.
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>> > > Question:
> > > > >>> > >
> > > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Docker-Nightly-9.x/
> > > > >>> > > description says Moved to github workflows:
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/solr/actions/workflows/docker-nightly.yml
> > > > >>> but
> > > > >>> > > that is only true for main, not 9x nor even 10x.  The GH
> screen
> > > > >>> shows this,
> > > > >>> > > not to mention the workflow yml file isn't on branch_9x (I
> > didn't
> > > > >>> check
> > > > >>> > > 10x).
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>> > > Note: I updated
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/JenkinsReleaseBuilds+-+Solr
> > > > >>> > > replacing the reference of solr-reference-guide-official to
> > > > >>> > > Solr-reference-guide-9.x
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>> > > The CI builds I created are working except for the
> smoketester:
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>>
> > > >
> > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Solr/job/Solr-Smoketest-9.11/3/console
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>> > >> RuntimeError: did not see "Release 9.11.0" in
> > > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> file:///home/jenkins/jenkins-agent/workspace/Solr/Solr-Smoketest-9.11/solr/distribution/build/release/changes/Changes.html
> > > > >>> > >>
> > > > >>> > >>
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>> > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 12:27 PM David Smiley <
> > > [email protected]>
> > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > >>> > >
> > > > >>> > >> NOTICE:
> > > > >>> > >>
> > > > >>> > >> Branch branch_9_11 has been cut and versions updated to 9.12
> > on
> > > > the
> > > > >>> > >> stable branch.
> > > > >>> > >>
> > > > >>> > >> Please observe the normal rules:
> > > > >>> > >>
> > > > >>> > >> * No new features may be committed to the branch.
> > > > >>> > >> * Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug fixes
> > may
> > > > be
> > > > >>> > >>   committed to the branch. However, you should submit all
> > > patches
> > > > >>> you
> > > > >>> > >>   want to commit to Jira first to give others the chance to
> > > review
> > > > >>> > >>   and possibly vote against the patch. Keep in mind that it
> is
> > > our
> > > > >>> > >>   main intention to keep the branch as stable as possible.
> > > > >>> > >> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first
> be
> > > > >>> committed
> > > > >>> > >>   to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and
> > > then
> > > > >>> into
> > > > >>> > >>   the current release branch.
> > > > >>> > >> * Normal unstable and stable branch development may continue
> > as
> > > > >>> usual.
> > > > >>> > >>   However, if you plan to commit a big change to the
> unstable
> > > > branch
> > > > >>> > >>   while the branch feature freeze is in effect, think twice:
> > > can't
> > > > >>> the
> > > > >>> > >>   addition wait a couple more days? Merges of bug fixes into
> > the
> > > > >>> branch
> > > > >>> > >>   may become more difficult.
> > > > >>> > >> * Only Jira issues with Fix version 9.11 and priority
> > "Blocker"
> > > > >>> will delay
> > > > >>> > >>   a release candidate build.
> > > > >>> > >>
> > > > >>> > >>
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to