Okay, so how do we want to handle changelog entries for these from Solrbot?  I 
want to draw attention to this conversation: 
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/4842#pullrequestreview-5077496282


It seems like we have a few options:

1) Tell Solrbot NOT to generate the changelog entry at all, since "title: 
Update all non-major dependencies” isn’t useful.

2) Require who ever merges these to tweak the changelog to list out all the 
items that are changed as part of the change.  Though that might be a very long 
list?

3) Maybe adopt documenting the dependency changes as part of the release 
process?   “These are the dependencies that changed between the previous 
release the current one”?   


For my part, I want to see the effort for whoever is merging these go down, so 
we don’t get back into a situation where we are way out of date on 
dependencies.   And since Solrbot fires off 12 times a year, it means we are 
only ~29 days from the next batch of Solrbot PR’s!

Eric







> On Sep 1, 2026, at 8:47 AM, Eric Pugh <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> It’s the first of the month, and we have 20 PR’s opened by Solrbot!  
> https://github.com/apache/solr/pulls/solrbot
> 
> We have six targeting branch_9x, and the rest are targeting main.   Looks 
> like the “Milestone” label being set to 10x is being applied, so at least the 
> back porting should happen via David’s magic bak porting process.
> 
> 
> I think it’s kind of good news / bad news thing that it appears that the 
> grouping has cut down on the number of PRs, like this one 
> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/4842 and 
> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/4845…. I can’t imagine what it was like 
> before we had grouping.
> 
> It looks like however we don’t have grouping on the branch_9x PR’s, with six 
> different PR’s.  
> 
> I don’t know if 20 is going to be the average number per month, but I hope 
> not!
> 
> It would be great if other folks look at the PR’s and approved them.
> 
> 

Disclaimer

The information contained in this communication from the sender is 
confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others 
authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the 
contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been 
automatically archived by Mimecast, a leader in email security and cyber 
resilience. Mimecast integrates email defenses with brand protection, security 
awareness training, web security, compliance and other essential capabilities. 
Mimecast helps protect large and small organizations from malicious activity, 
human error and technology failure; and to lead the movement toward building a 
more resilient world. To find out more, visit our website.

Reply via email to