+1 (binding) On Thu, Oct 8, 2026 at 5:59 AM Alessandro Benedetti <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > Didn't have time to go deep (hence I didn't get why 2 repos rather than 1), > but I'm on board with the idea of having an official MCP for Solr! > > Cheers > -------------------------- > *Alessandro Benedetti* > Director @ Sease Ltd. > *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer* > *Apache Solr Chair of PMC* > > e-mail: [email protected] > > > *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied > Consulting | Training | Open Source > > Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/> > LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter > <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github > <https://github.com/seaseltd> > > > On Wed, 7 Oct 2026 at 22:43, Houston Putman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Seems like we are just formalizing what already exists, which is > perfectly > > fine. > > > > - Houston > > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2026 at 8:21 AM Eric Pugh <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On 2026/10/05 21:52:43 Marc Byrd wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > m > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2026 at 3:36 PM <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > Something I wanted to add: > > > > > > > > > > I see that the README already lists STDIO as a transport mode. > > > > > > > > > > Aditya, I was curious whether there is anything from the newer MCP > > > > > specification that we could implement or optimize in Solr MCP. > > > > > > > > > > Link: > > > > > https://blog.modelcontextprotocol.io/posts/2026-07-28/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Would love to hear everyone’s views on this. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Arup > > > > > On Oct 5, 2026 at 2:08 PM -0500, Andrzej Bialecki <[email protected]>, > > > wrote: > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Andrzej > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2026-10-05 18:50 UTC Eric Pugh wrote: > > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As many of you may be familiar with, there has been a desire to > > > enable > > > > > Solr inside agentic environments natively through the MCP protocol > > > with a > > > > > community blessed solution ( > > > > > https://github.com/adityamparikh/solr-mcp-server/issues/12). Such > a > > > tool > > > > > will ensure that Solr becomes more accessible to non developers > like > > > data > > > > > scientists or ops folks who primarily interact via Agents with > Solr. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We have already created the public ASF repo for "Solr MCP", > > almost > > > a > > > > > year ago, however we never held the formal vote thread for this > > > process. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This thread is a vote on creating a public ASF repo for "Solr > > > MCP", a > > > > > contribution from https://github.com/adityamparikh/solr-mcp-server > > > that > > > > > Eric Pugh has been working closing with the original developer, > > Aditya > > > > > Parikh on making ASF compliant and work well with Solr, with > > > supervision > > > > > from Jan Høydahl. For context, Solr MCP has been demoed in > community > > > > > meetings, and will be featured at Community over Code 2026 in the > > > Search > > > > > Track. I encourage you to test out a nightly build via this > > > "playground" > > > > > https://adityamparikh.github.io/solr-mcp/. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A passing vote means: > > > > > > > * Confirming two github repo github.com/apache/solr-mcp under > > > current > > > > > Solr ownership > > > > > > > * Confirming the current state of the Solr MCP code (clean > > > history). > > > > > This has been documented in > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/solr-mcp/blob/main/solr-mcp-ip-clearance.xml > > > > > > > * PMC to conduct legal check and IP clearance as needed. This > has > > > > > already been started, see > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-716. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please vote on initiating a new solr-mcp sub-project under the > > > Apache > > > > > Solr project: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [] +1 Accept the proposal --- I support creating these > > repositories > > > > > > > [] 0 No strong opinion > > > > > > > [] -1 Object --- Provide a reason > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a procedural vote with simple majority. Votes from PMC > > > members > > > > > are binding; > > > > > > > votes from community members are welcome. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The vote will remain open for at least 3 business days, closing > > no > > > > > earlier than: > > > > > > > 2026-10-08 22:00 UTC > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The vote result will guide further action > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Eric > > > > > > > > > > > > > > References: > > > > > > > * > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2gvf4cz0tm22bsv8hg1ywcwvpk8zsv2n > > > > > > > * https://github.com/adityamparikh/solr-mcp-server/issues/12 > > > > > > > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-716 > > > > > > > * > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/solr-mcp/blob/main/solr-mcp-ip-clearance.xml > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is my +1 (binding). > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > >
