http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3238
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-03 10:41 ------- > 3.0.0 milestone - needs to be decided now if we're going to change this As an outside viewpoint, I'm in favor of one character (either zero or space) of padding to force the score to two places. I've started using this in my spam subjects, and it is making it A LOT easier to sort down and concentrate on the low-scoring spam for new rules. (In fact I wish there were two padding digits, since quite a lot of my spam scores well over a hundred and clutters up the low-scoring spams. I can see enough arguments againt reserving three digits to the left of the dp for the score that I'm not going to argue hard for this one though. But I wish there were an option for "score padding digits" or the like.) I agree with Dunc that a new name might be the best way to go here. You could just keep the old _HITS_ name for this purpose, but you probably don't want to. As wordy as it is, I would prefer _SORTABLESCORE_ or the like to _PADSCORE_ as a term. What I might prefer even more would be two new terms, _PAD0SCORE_ and _PAD00SCORE_. These are ugly, but would allow the user to choose one or two padding digits. (Or maybe _PAD1SCORE_ and _PAD2SCORE_). Yea, I think I like those last terms best. In my opinion it doesn't matter whether you pad zeros or spaces, they will both sort the same way (barring negative signs) and spaces are prettier. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
