http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3781
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-15 13:25 ------- Subject: Re: There should be a rule type for mime part headers On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 12:39:01PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > 1. the MIME-ish "Binary" plugin I'm working on based on MSExec could do > this in addition to what I'm working on now (accessing raw MIME part > data) > > I think I would probably object to a new core test type for just MIME > part headers. The was a short discussion on the dev list. My suggestion was that there be a plugin to implement the rule type, since the information in body mime headers has not been found to be very useful in anti-spam work. Depending on whether or not that has changed and is now useful, the rule type could be made "standard". I responded to Chris Santerre's message requesting the plugin (ie: what kind of information/queries are they looking to do), but have not received a response. Since the body mime bits and the binary bits are pretty much the same, I think getting them together in the same plugin would be fine. The code to look in the body mime headers is pretty trivial though, so a separate plugin may be good depending on what is actually desired in such a plugin. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
