http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3530





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-09-17 13:55 -------
I can see your point: there are also cases where the current behaviour
is correct. How do you think we can improve the behaviour of ALL_TRUSTED? 

Maybe we need to work on the parsing of the received lines - it strikes
me that there could be some improvement there which would then lead to
being able to better have ALL_TRUSTED show up when it should, and not
when it shouldn't.

Most of the spam that makes it past my "definitely-spam" mailbox and
into my "possibly-spam" mailbox is there because it gets a big negative
score from ALL_TRUSTED. This wouldn't be so bad, except that in the vast
majority of these cases, ALL_TRUSTED is flagged when it shouldn't be.




------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Reply via email to