http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3675
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-20 19:14 -------
Subject: Re: [review] pick a project logo
what Christian sent to me earlier today:
I am following the discussion on the bug tracker page and I would like
to comment that the logo on a non-white background would be a problem
anyway since the arrow bleeds outside. Maybe less of a problem with the
integrated version but I don't think it would solve it.
>From my experience, I would suggest that people choose the logo not on
such a practicality but on design because adjustement would need to be
made anyway for a non-white background. Plus, it is much easier to
change the font color than to find a solutio to the bleeding arrow problem.
Let me know if you guys would like another iteration with only 2 or 3 logos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
what I just sent to Christian:
Collected comments:
top 5 from each person:
Daniel: 4.4i, 4.4j, 4.3h-2,5,7
Duncan: 4.3h-7,5,2, 4.3h, 4.3h-6
Justin: 4.4h, 4.4l (4.4i?), 4.3h-4 (not red), 4.3h-3 (not envelope
colors), 4.4j
Sidney: 4.4i, 4.4j, 4.3h
Michael: integrated
Theo: everything from 4.3h-7, but the background rectangle color of 4.3h-4
I think we have rough consensus on:
basic envelope colors: green, green or blue, and orangish red (spam)
favorites: 4.3h-7, 4.3h-5, 4.3h-2
background: I think we'd like to compare (1) a darker gray than 4.4i/4.4j
(integrated), (2) current orange (not integrated), or (3) a
lighter and cooler orange (maybe integrated)
Could you give us a 2x3 (6 option) matrix for the above?
green vs. blue for second envelope
dark gray integrated vs. orange non-integrated vs. lighter orange integrated
Daniel
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
