http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3816
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-23 22:59 ------- Subject: Re: Add an X-header to know when added a Subject header On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 10:42:34PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Eh? I'm not sure I followed that. Are you saying 3.0 makes an > X-Spam-Prev-Subject: header with the original subject before installing > header markup? Right. > If so, then all this "how to tag" stuff seems moot. There ain't gonna be an > X-Spam-Prev-Subject header if there was no previous Subject. That seems > like a pretty good clue about what the result should be after remove_markup. Well.. Not really. There doesn't need to be a Prev version, per backward compatibility. So the lack of the header doesn't tell you anything in and of itself. Quinlan's thing would work for now, but relies on the backward compatibility code to work (fine for now, but bad juju in general). Hence my kluge comment -- the requested behavior doesn't really fit in with the 3.0 way of doing things without doing something special just for this situation. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
