http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-29 17:12 ------- Subject: Re: [review] SURBL ccTLD list updated, please update SA TLD code On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 05:03:30PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In the initial report Jeff wrote 'Really this is just for completeness since > geographic domains other than .us aren't used in spams too often.' -- then > IMO > we should not include any of the others as bigger the RE as more overhead we > have. Yeah, I actually was noticing that the 4TLD and 3TLD domains are REs, but the 2TLD ones are simple "example.tld" strings. So in theory, we could just grab the last two sections of the FQDN, then do a hash lookup. For the 3.0.1 code, I'd like to just do the update. For the 3.1 code, I'm tempted to change it around. If things like SURBL are only going to list actual domains, we need to deal with that correctly. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
