On Thursday 30 September 2004 19:40 CET Bob Apthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Justin Mason wrote:
> > actually, you're right on both; I just checked with perl -e in perl
> > 5.8.4. I must have been thinking of java instead of perl ;)
>
> Thanks for the review! I'm cleaning up the guts of the code now and
> hopefully it'll Just Work.

Actually also NoMailAudit doesn't have to be require()d.  Because (I checked 
till back to 2.30) Mail::SpamAssassin always use()d NMA and such that 
module was also available to the calling code.  I guess we just documented 
it otherwise in case we ever changed our minds :)

So all which is needed is the second branch which diverges between 
NMA->new() and $spamtest->parse().  I hope :)

Cheers,
Malte

-- 
[SGT] Simon G. Tatham: "How to Report Bugs Effectively"
      <http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html>
[ESR] Eric S. Raymond: "How To Ask Questions The Smart Way"
      <http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html>

Reply via email to