http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3839
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-01 18:42 ------- Created an attachment (id=2405) --> (http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2405&action=view) diff -ru between those two dump files OK, here's the scoop. This is the diff between Devel::Peek::Dump output from just after compile_now(), and just after the first scan in a child spamd process. Interesting things: in the "scores" hash: Elt "INVALID_DATE" HASH = 0xf102ea6e SV = PVNV(0x8e3d838) at 0x8e0cf0c REFCNT = 1 - FLAGS = (NOK,pNOK) - IV = 0 + FLAGS = (IOK,NOK,pIOK,pNOK) + IV = 1 NV = 1 PV = 0 so somehow a few rules are picking up new "IOK" flags -- ie. cached integer-cast versions. That means that all the pages with those SVs would be copied. These seem to be the rules that are hitting in the message I scanned. (I used "t/spamd.t".) In addition, an "AWL" entry is being created in the "scoresets" arrays, and picking up PV values -- ie. cached stringified versions. The message was autolearned as spam and added to the AWL. Both these are not used in compile_now(). and now my brain hurts. ;) ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
