http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3874
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 02:21 ------- Subject: Re: New: Definitions of internal/trusted networks too vague > http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3874 > > Thanks - an apologies for the rather vague report. I've thought a bit more about this... Internal networks contain relays that are mxs or internal relays, but not relays that accept mail from dialup. Trusted networks contain relays not operated by spammers, not open relays, and not open proxies. So, both contain relays, pretty much - assuming internal networks don't contain open relays operated by spammers? Trusted networks contain hosts that can relay spam, but won't forge headers or originate spam. Does that mean internal networks can't relay spam, will forge headers, and will orignate spam? Obviously not, so again they're still almost the same. There'll be no blacklist checks on trusted relays... but there will on internal ones? Ah - it seems trusted hosts that aren't relays are in the trusted networks. And internal relays can't accept mail from dailup. Are those the only real differences between internal and trusted networks? Tim. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
