On Wednesday, October 6, 2004, 7:05:41 AM, Chris Santerre wrote: >>From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>And some list counts from those hits: >> >> [ws] hits: 1173 >> [ob] hits: 165 >> [jp] hits: 61 >> [sc] hits: 8 >> [ab] hits: 4 >> [ph] hits: 2 >> >>These add up to more than 1338 since some records hit multiple >>lists. The actual hits are in: >> >> http://spamcheck.freeapp.net/whitelists/dmoz-blocklist.ws > Wow, it looks like some of the DMOZ data can't be trusted. Some of those > domains in this WS blocklist are pure spammers. > adultmovienetwork.com has 135+ NANAS hits, is listed in spamhaus, ect..... Sure, but do they have any legitimate (non-spam) uses or ham mentions? (apple.com has 851 NANAS hits. Does that make them spammers?) Spamhaus is a good indication, but they may not have exactly the same operational requirements as we do: namely don't block ham. > These need to ALL be checked carefully. Do not use DMOZ to autowhitelist. I > will check A-C in this list. Any takers to check the rest? > 1173 FPs......I doubt it. > --Chris I've broken down the WS data source hits individually in a private message to all the WS data folks. Perhaps people could start by checking their individual ones. Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
