>-----Original Message----- >From: Dallas L. Engelken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 12:01 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: RE: Spamd is a memory hog (?) > > >Hey Chris, > >> Well yeah, I had it happen to me and just removed a child. >> Everything was fine after that. Its a configuration problem, >> not an SA problem. People are used to seeing 1-2 instances >> running I think. Not used to having all the instances >> preloaded I guess. >> > >No offense, but I don't think you process enough mail on that system to >feel any ill-effects. :) > >I know on my personal box I never have any problems with 3.0.0 either. > >Also, you shouldn't have to 'remove a child' that is acting up. It >shouldn't act up, and if it does, the parent should slap it. You don't >have kids do you? > >hehe
LOL. Oh I know I don't proccess anywhere near some of the numbers you guys do. I shut the child down because I don't need that many running and taking up that much memory. But it was also killing bayes and AWL that drastically improved things. Hell, try running your system without Bayes and just SURBL for a week. Tell me if anything slips thru. I bet it still catches everything. Oh I have 2 kids, and I'm currently trying to limit those child processes as well! I keep trying to to run: /usr/local/doctor/snipppet , but I keep getting: "ERROR: Wife overun, KID$ != 3" Someone shoot me! --Chris
