Hello Chris, Justin, Friday, November 19, 2004, 5:57:51 AM, you wrote:
>>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 9:16 PM >>To: dev@spamassassin.apache.org >>Subject: proposal: an automated rule-qa system >> CS> *SNIP* >> >>We add a web-app somewhere that periodically scrapes bugzilla >>for bugs on the "rules" component which contain some token from trusted >>users indicating that they contain rules that need testing. >> >>That then extracts rules from attachments/text on that bug, and >> CS> *SNIP* >>Sound useful? That should at least take some legwork out of rule QA, >>and stop us committers being a bottleneck in the process. CS> +1 ;) Ditto, er, +1. :-) CS> Although the ninjas have been really slow to find new rules, as CS> spam is getting caught so well now. Speak for yourself, Chris. I've developed several dozen rules in the past month. Unfortunately, with no system to mass-check them on, I'm going on the theory that none, or maybe just one of them, warrants formal submission, and that one can wait for a few more days until I can mass-check it... However, there are a number of rules currently in our SARE rules files which probably are worth submitting, and as soon as I can get my @[EMAIL PROTECTED] system running again[fn], I may do so. Bob Menschel [fn] Can't blame it all on MS -- almost had it running again the way I wanted when Wednesday last week the hard drive crashed on me.
